Obama: Whassup With That?
It's already been established that using white gay folks to explain to Blacks that the gay civil rights movement is the same as the 1960's Civil Right Movement doesn't work. In fact, it's an automatic turn off for most Blacks, including this Black lesbian.
Let's get straight to it.
What the hell were Obama's people thinking when they invited a white openly gay minister to open for his South Carolina gospel concert with Donnie McClurkin?
Is he trying to lose the race? That's all I want to know.
It was bad enough that Obama's people invited and announced a gospel concert tour through South Carolina with openly homophobic singers Mary Mary and the ex-gay McClurkin, which sparked accusations of Obama running a homophobic campaign.
But keepin' hope alive, I tried to make the best of it hoping that the protests would be used as a learning moment for Obama and his campaign advisers. No such luck. First we get the standard statement that was posted in the LGBT section of his website in the beginning and not the website's general newsroom, as if to say that this is for the gays only and we want to keep this under wraps.
But to add injury to insult, Obama's campaign announces that he invited an openly gay minister to open the gospel concert. Initially I thought he'd gotten with someone in the Black same-gender loving community, perhaps a minister from Unity Fellowship Church, or some other minister that was of African descent. Instead we get Rev. Andy Sidden, a white South Carolina pastor. Then, just in case the knife wasn't in deep enough Obama speaks with the Human Rights Campaign's (HRC) president Joe Solmonese about it.
Where are the Black gay civil rights groups? Am I the only one that sees this as problematic?
First of all, let's address the issue of having a white gay pastor at a campaign event that's geared towards religious African Americans. Here we have a perfect opportunity for African Americans to internally address the issue of homophobia with an African American presidential candidate and instead of inviting a Black openly gay pastor, they invite a white man. Are we trying to see a repeat of 2004?
Because if that's the goal, we sure are headed down the right track. And in the end, in my opinion it's Black gays who have the most to lose from this happening as there's already a general consensus that gay is synonymous with white. All this will do is further that notion and drive it home; undoing all of the work that Black lesbians and gays have done over the past decade within their communities.
I know that what I am saying is harsh. Harsh; not racist. Harsh; but true. It's already been established that using white gay folks to explain to Blacks that the gay civil rights movement is the same as the 1960's Civil Right Movement doesn't work. In fact, it's an automatic turn off for most Blacks, including this Black lesbian. With a sensitive issue like this, it's important that Blacks talk to Blacks. Our community needs to see us and hear from us and no one but us. And if we sit up here and allow this to go down, we have no one but ourselves to blame for our invisibility.
It's not personal against Rev. Sidden, I am sure he's a great person. It is personal however with HRC who knows better but can't ever seem to pass up the chance to make the national news, no matter whose community gets dumped on in the process. But oh I forgot, we've come such a long way.
In a statement, HRC thanked Obama for including Sidden but said that they were disappointed McClurkin will remain part of the program.
Please note that they were not disappointed that an openly Black minister wasn't chosen or that Black gays were not a part of the conversation and that it was important for African Americans to hear from their same-gender loving daughters, sons, sisters, brothers, mothers, and fathers. No, instead they were disappointed that McClurkin was still a part of the program.
What is the message in using a white openly gay pastor at a Black event to convince Blacks that homophobia is wrong? What kind of message does that send?
Now I am wondering who or what constitutes as an ally? Is an ally an ally when it's beneficial to them and them alone? Is an ally and ally when there are no media around? Is an ally an ally when they have millions in the bank and are still going after the same pots of money as their lesser-funded "people of color" counterparts?
Tell me, are we allies then? An ally would have bowed out gracefully and encouraged an African American gay civil rights organization to take the lead. And if that organization for whatever reason failed to step to the plate, the ally could have pointed out that an important part of the equation is missing---Black gays.
When our allies ran down to Jena, Louisiana, to show support for Blacks, I don't recall them trying to upstage or drown out the voices of Reverend's Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson.
But no, Black gays get screwed from both sides, no pun intended.
Whether you believe it or not, having to talk about this in the manner that I have is not something that I get a kick out of doing. In fact, I try to ignore as much of this I can. I was compelled to give my two cents.
Obama, over the past week has made it increasingly difficult for me as an African American to overlook a horrendous mistake that was only made worse with the announcement of the invitation of Rev. Sidden.
I can put up with you hiring people who don't look like me or you who are then sent into our communities to "rally us." It's hard, but I can deal with it. Even when those people come into our communities and use our leaders to stage events and that bring us out, and then at the same time turn around and try to undermine our strategies. I mean after all, there's no written law that says you have to be from the community and at least identify with the community you are trying to cajole. But it does help, that's all I'm saying.
I can even rationalize how a homophobic gospel artist could get booked for a campaign event, especially if there's no one around to say anything differently. No one, like maybe openly lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender Blacks. Although, there's still no guarantee that even if there had been someone that raised a flag about the concert that his or her opinion would have been taken seriously. Just keeping it real.
The belief that whites are trying to push gay issues onto Blacks further divides the African American community from their same-gender loving counterparts who continue to remain invisible. All of this while racial incidents involving whites and Blacks are occurring from coast to coast.
Couple that with a heavily divided Black constituency on issues of morality during a pivotal Presidential election and we stand a higher chance of repeating the past, which resulted in the current regime.
Where does all of this leave Black gays? What are we supposed to do? You keep pushing us against wall and I know we let you slide before, but this one can't be overlooked. We deserve better. The best thing would have been to nix Sidden and to invite an openly gay Black pastor.
To comment or to subscribe to or advertise in New York’s leading Pan African weekly investigative newspaper, or to send us a news tip, please call (212) 481-7745 or send a note to Milton@blackstarnews.com
"Speaking Truth To Power."
Ann GarrisonNovember 30,2013 @ 12:14 PM
It was sexy to be against the war back then. He was probably in it to get laid.
carpinteyrobwmJuly 14,2013 @ 09:29 PM
carpinteyrobwmJuly 14,2013 @ 08:34 PM
amslctciikJuly 13,2013 @ 01:47 AM
http://youngsgear.us - louis vuitton bags cheap on the inside...
No Record Exist!!