Rwanda: Gen. Kagame Deserves Conviction Not Victoire Ingabire Umuhoza
Because of Rwanda's support of M23 terrorists in Congo the U.S. cut some aid to Rwanda as have some European countries.
[Black Star News Editorial]
The sham treason trial of Rwanda's top opposition leader Victoire Ingabire Umuhoza has finally ended with her expected conviction.
The U.S., which recently cut aid to Rwanda for its role in Congo atrocities, must call for Umuhoza's release. She has been sentenced to eight years in prison by a Kangaroo court.
And what was her real crime? Umuhoza, an ethnic Hutu, had declared that genuine reconciliation in Rwanda can't occur until the authorities acknowledged that in addition to Tutsis, Hutus were also massacred during the 1994 ethnic killings.
For taking this honest position, Umuhoza was arrested and charged with historical revisionism, inciting ethnic hatred and also "genocide denial." She never had a chance at a fair trial. Her chief counsel, Peter Erlinder an American law professor, was arrested earlier during the trial, imprisoned and also threatened with charges of "genocide denial" before being expelled from the country after an international outcry.
In truth, the charges against Umuhoza and the trial were convenient ways to prevent her from participating in Rwanda's last presidential elections, which many observers believe she would have won. Rwanda's dictator Gen. Paul Kagame was declared the winner with unheard of margins -- the kind of election results that used to be associated with leaders of the Soviet union.
Umuhoza was convicted for being brave and daring to challenge the Gen. Kagame regime.
But Gen. Kagame himself has a much bigger headache. For years Kagame was granted a blank check by Western countries that credited him with halting the ethnic killings of 1994. That conventional narrative of Gen. Kagame as Rwanda's savior has been under increasing scrutiny lately.
On November 17, 2006, a French investigative judge, Jean-Louis Bruguière, indicted several senior Rwanda military officers for the assassination of Habyarimana and for sparking Rwanda's 1994 massacres. The judge said Kagame should stand trial for ordering the April 6, 1994 downing with missiles of the plane that carried Rwanda's then president Juvenal Habyarimana; he perished with Burundi's president Cyprien Ntaryamira who was traveling with him.
According to the French judge, Gen. Kagame's plan was to cynically use the chaos and mass killings that he knew would follow the assassination to seize power and be hailed as a liberator.
At the time of Habyarimana's assassination, Kagame's Rwanda Patriotic Front (RPF), which had launched a war of aggression in October 1990 from Uganda, backed by Yoweri Museveni, was inking a peace deal to stop four years of warfare.
For years Kagame had dismissed the charges by the French judge as a cover-up by France to mask that country's own role in backing Habyarimana's regime for years.
Yet Gen. Kagame's alleged involvement in subsequent atrocities now make it harder to maintain the conventional narrative's fantasies. In 2010 the United Nations so-called "Mapping Report" documented the massacres of Hutu refugees inside the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) by Kagame's army.
More recently, in June, Gen. Kagame's army was implicated in a new United Nations "Group of Experts" report in the on-going massacres of civilians in Congo by a Rwanda backed group called M23.
Rwanda's Gen. James Kaberebe, Rwanda's defense minister who is implicated in the June U.N. report, was also indicted by Judge Bruguière in 2006 for the assassination of Habyarimana.
As a result of the United Nations' findings the United States has cut some aid to Rwanda as have some European countries. Congo's government has called on the United Nations Security Council action against Rwanda; meanwhile Congolese and Rwandan activists want war crimes charges by the International Criminal Court (ICC) against Gen. Kagame, a prospect that doesn't seem totally unlikely anymore.
Given this backdrop, it's possible the regime may have announced Umuhoza's conviction -- after several delays-- to deflect attention from Gen. Kagame's own crisis and as a negotiating carrot with his Western sponsors.
Nevertheless, a sham trial is a sham trial.
Umuhoza must be released unconditionally or granted an impartial fully-monitored trial, with counsel of her choice.
Her conviction by the Kangaroo court must be set aside.
"Speaking Truth To Empower."
Ann GarrisonNovember 30,2013 @ 12:14 PM
It was sexy to be against the war back then. He was probably in it to get laid.
carpinteyrobwmJuly 14,2013 @ 09:29 PM
carpinteyrobwmJuly 14,2013 @ 08:34 PM
penskripplJuly 14,2013 @ 07:16 PM
Pay Day Loans Uk don't require novels of paperwork. uk pay day loans are the problem? To avail...
penskripplJuly 14,2013 @ 07:16 PM
Our next question is when you are satisfied to see some modest improvements in their review of...
No Record Exist!!