The Death Of Journalism
It seems that the news is now seen more as entertainment than as an information tool for the public ...With fewer and fewer owners, conglomerates such as Gannett can shape the nation's news. And with the recent rulings of the Federal Communications Commission, media conglomerates are allowed to own print and broadcast media in the same town and in many towns. Last year the New York Times had to apologize to its readers about its coverage in the weeks leading up to the Iraq war. It seems that its primary ...
My journalism broadcast professor, John Patterson, must be rolling over in his grave. A former CBS newsman and Edward R. Murrow acolyte, he used to tell us that the only real morning news program was on his old station. He taught us that integrity was the only real currency of journalism.
Indeed, that journalistic integrity was what sent me to journalism school only a year or so after the Washington Post expose the Watergate scandal. The whole nation looked up to journalists in those days.
Now, the major television networks are all owned by corporations. Fox is owned by Rupert Murdoch, and its news division is headed by a former Republican pundit. CBS is owned by Viacom, a company owned by conservative multi-millionaire Sumner Redstone. NBC is owned by General Electric, with its large military contracts. ABC is owned by Disney. They will all tell us that the news divisions are separated from their corporate offices, but one must wonder how much that is really the case.
In any event, networks have slashed their budgets for newsrooms. The rush to get a story on air first has led to many mistakes and we are deluged with entertainment and sports figures trials. In Cleveland, where I live, there was even a young woman reporter who appeared on air naked to tell the story of a photo shoot. It seems that the news is now seen more as entertainment than as an information tool for the public and a medium which is at the heart of democracy.
Print media is not much better. With fewer and fewer owners, conglomerates such as Gannett can shape the nation's news. And with the recent rulings of the Federal Communications Commission, media conglomerates are allowed to own print and broadcast media in the same town and in many towns.
Last year the New York Times had to apologize to its readers about its coverage in the weeks leading up to the Iraq war. It seems that its primary reporter on that build-up was relying primarily on information supplied by a now-discredited Pentagon informer. Few other newspapers raised the hard questions in those days either.
The latest phenomenon in this dangerous drift is the use of reporters and so-called reporters by the White House and cabinet members to pitch the No Child Left Behind Act and other administration programs. Over the past couple of months it has been revealed that the administration has paid one reporter and columnist a quarter of a million dollars. Several others were paid much less, but nevertheless it is a frightening use of tax payer funds. Now we're paying to have our opinions made for us and then reported to us.
Most recently it was revealed that a "reporter" accredited by the White House and called upon in White House press conferences was really no reporter at all, but a plant by a GOP web-site. In this post 9/11 age, with security at its zenith, one must ask how could such a fake person, without the proper social security number and other identification, be allowed into the White House, let alone into the most prized journalistic site in the nation.
In listening to a National Public Radio broadcast of Daniel Schorr's commentary a few days ago, I learned that the U.S. Senate action relative to the Terry Schiavo case had occurred with only three U.S. Senators present. The voice vote was called "unanimous consent." There was very little reporting of that fact, which changes how one might perceive of that action.
Without a strong, independent media a democracy of the people, by the people and for the people cannot exist. We are on dangerous shoals right now and we don't seem even to know it. Or maybe we just don't care.
For more reports please subscribe to the newsstand edition of The Black Star News by calling (212) 481-7745.
Ann GarrisonNovember 30,2013 @ 12:14 PM
It was sexy to be against the war back then. He was probably in it to get laid.
carpinteyrobwmJuly 14,2013 @ 09:29 PM
carpinteyrobwmJuly 14,2013 @ 08:34 PM
amslctciikJuly 13,2013 @ 01:47 AM
http://youngsgear.us - louis vuitton bags cheap on the inside...
No Record Exist!!