CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS REPORT: RACIST POLICING POLICY CONTINUES IN THE NYPD

-A +A
0

[Racial Policing\Center for Constitutional Rights]
The monitor further found serious flaws in the NYPD’s process for investigating racial profiling complaints against its officers, to the extent that complainants, witnesses and officers are often not even interviewed, leads are not followed up on, and investigators often fail to take note of prior profiling complaints against particular officers.
Photo: Facebook

The Center for Constitutional Rights today in a new report said what Black and Latino New Yorkers already know: racist policing is still a primary policy of the NYPD. Will new Police Commissioner Dermot Shea be any better in honestly tackling NYPD racism than his predecessors?

In response to the release, today, of the latest status report by the court-appointed monitor in the landmark stop-and-frisk case Floyd v. City of New York, the Center for Constitutional Rights issued the following statement from Senior Attorney Darius Charney:

Six years after a federal court found the New York City Police Department’s stop-and-frisk practices racially discriminatory, it is clear the NYPD has failed to meaningfully address this ruling. The court-appointed monitor’s 10th report shows that significant racial disparities persist, with Black and Latinx New Yorkers much more likely than whites to be subjected to illegal stops.

The monitor further found serious flaws in the NYPD’s process for investigating racial profiling complaints against its officers, to the extent that complainants, witnesses and officers are often not even interviewed, leads are not followed up on, and investigators often fail to take note of prior profiling complaints against particular officers.

This is unsurprising given the report by the NYPD Inspector General last summer, which found that of the more than 2,600 racial profiling complaints members of the public made against NYPD officers in the past four years, NYPD internal investigators found every single one to be “unsubstantiated.”

These and other shortcomings identified in the report point to serious, systemic, ongoing problems that go to the heart of the unconstitutional racial bias found in our lawsuit and which cannot be fixed by implicit bias training or changes to the Patrol Guide.

At the same time, absent from the monitor’s report is any data or input from the people who are being policed. As the Floyd court recognized in ordering a Joint Remedial Process that included extensive community input, the NYPD’s stop-and-frisk problems cannot be remedied without the expertise of affected communities.

For more information on the Center for Constitutional Rights logon to: https://ccrjustice.org

Also Check Out...

Nigeria is extending curfews beyond the city of Lagos as anti-riot officers struggle to quell violence following protests
Nigeria protests: Millions placed
While Africa Amnesty Month is September, this year’s event took place one month late because of the coronavirus pandemic.
African Governments Encourage
Principal Masten, where'd you get real handcuffs? Just any given racist school day with tone deaf (and freaky) School of Hate Pr
‘SCHOOL OF HATE’ to NAACP: white
The juror also said that Attorney General Daniel Cameron’s team never explained possible homicide charges to the panel.
Breonna Taylor Juror: grand jury
 Black law enforcement officers are speaking out against these endorsements
Black Police officers break from
Access to Internet broadband is less than 50 percent in the region
Closing Digital Gap in Latin