New York's Schneiderman and 16 Other Attorneys General Oppose Trump Labor Department's Bid to Gut ACA

-A +A
0

New York AG Schneiderman. Photo-Flickr

The attorneys general of New York and Massachusetts are leading a coalition of 17 attorneys general in opposing the Trump Department of Labor’s Proposed Rule, which seeks to expand the criteria for forming association health plans (AHPs) in order to evade the consumers protections enshrined in the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and sabotage the ACA.

AHPs have a long history of fraud, mismanagement, and abuse, with millions in unpaid claims for policyholders and providers, often leading to consumer bankruptcies.  

“The Trump administration’s rule is nothing more than an unlawful end run around the consumer protections enshrined in the affordable care act, part of President Trump’s continued efforts to sabotage the ACA,” New York's Eric T. Schneiderman said. “These so-called association health plans have a long history of fraud and abuse – leaving consumers holding the bag when an unforeseen medical issue arises. We won’t stand by as the Trump administration seeks to gut the most basic protections for consumers in a dangerous, partisan effort to undermine our health care system.”

In addition to Schneiderman and Massachusetts' Maura Healey, other attorneys general signing on to the joint comment filed are from:  California, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Hawaii, Iowa, Illinois, Maryland, Maine, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and Vermont.

President Trump himself cited the sabotage of the ACA as the clear purpose of the Proposed Rule, stating while signing the order that he was “taking crucial steps towards saving the American people from the nightmare of Obamacare,” and tweeting the following day that “ObamaCare is a broken mess. Piece by piece we will now begin the process of giving America the great HealthCare it deserves!” 

Over the last few decades, Congress has legislated – including through the ACA – to protect health care consumers from AHPs’ fraudulent conduct. The Proposed Rule would undo critical consumer protections and unduly expand access to AHPs without sufficient justification or consideration of the consequences. 

The Attorneys General warn that projections forecast that the Proposed Rule, if finalized, would lead to several million enrollees shifting out of the ACA’s individual and small group markets into AHPs with far fewer health benefits and that the Proposed Rule would increase premiums for those remaining in the individual ACA market. 

State Attorneys General have extensive experience protecting individuals and small employers from predatory entities that seek to defraud or deceive customers through the use of AHPs. They seek that the Proposed Rule is unlawful and would invite fraud and wrongdoing in the health insurance market that will threaten the health and financial security of consumers nationwide.

The Proposed Rule reverses decades of agency and judicial interpretation of ERISA’s key terms, with the primary purpose of undermining the ACA  Because the DOL’s proposed changes would increase the risk of fraud and harm to consumers, undermine the current small-group and individual health insurance markets, and are also inconsistent with the text of ERISA and the ACA, the Attorneys General are urging that the Proposed Rule be withdrawn.

 
 

Also Check Out...

The 1st Annual Miami Black College Expo
Miami Black College Expo
President Joe Biden brought dignity back to the White House and pride back to the nation.
Lincoln Project Gives Biden Thumbs
Greg McKenzie, a former correctional officer, obstructed an investigation into the smuggling of a firearm into the MCC
NY Correctional Officer Sentenced
COPS Office Tuesday announced the completion of a Roadmap for Implementation for the Columbus Division of Police
DOJ Releases ‘Roadmap’ To
scoring championships and records, I’m telling you, that was never on my mind.”
NBA Scoring King: LeBron Passes
Ongoing redistricting fights mean voters in some states may encounter fairer or more gerrymandered maps in the next election.
How Voting Districts Could Change